LXC vs Docker: Pros and Cons Explained

Discover the differences in capabilities, tooling, and functionality between LXC vs Docker containers. Understand the use cases for running apps and service deployments


  • Docker makes deploying app packages on a server in production environments much easier since all the application prerequisites, dependencies, and requirements are contained in the Docker container image platform.
  • Note that Docker container images are still built on top of a Linux distro like Alpine Linux or some other lightweight design with the ability to run the app image.
  • It also means, unlike a full virtual machine running on a hypervisor like VMware or openstack on bare metal, LXC containers do not emulate hardware.

When we start talking about running containers in the home lab or production, two types of containers usually come up in conversation for running services: LXC containers and Docker containers. This article will examine a comparison between LXC and Docker, helping you understand the differences in their capabilities, tooling, functionality, differences, and appropriate use cases for running apps and service deployments.

What are LXC containers?

LXC stands for Linux Container and is a pioneering technology in containerization. Some consider it to be the pure form of containers since it closely mimics a full virtual machine. As opposed to running full virtual machines, it provides a lightweight alternative requiring less utilization. It provides a virtual environment to create isolated processes and a network space without the full Linux operating system.

LXC leverages the Linux operating systems kernel of the host OS to create isolated environments, which essentially are like VMs but with less overhead. If you have used Proxmox, no doubt you know the containers you can easily create in Proxmox are LXC containers. However, you can use your favorite Linux distro, like Ubuntu, and install LXC containers. 

When you right-click on your PVE node, you can choose the Create CT option which will create a new LXC container.

Creating an lxc container in proxmox
Creating an lxc container in proxmox

The Architecture of LXC Containers

LXC containers (Linux containers) are known for being simple and efficient. They operate by creating a separate operating system environment within the host system to create multiple isolated environments.

Unlike virtual machines that require their own kernel, LXC containers share the host’s kernel, making them more efficient regarding resource usage. LXC containers sit somewhere in the middle of an enhanced chroot and a full-fledged virtual machine. It also means, unlike a full virtual machine running on a hypervisor like VMware or openstack on bare metal, LXC containers do not emulate hardware.

Despite sharing the host kernel, they have their own file system and provide an effective boundary of separation between the LXC environment and the host. LXC containers require some prior Linux knowledge and basic command line experience running Linux bash commands.

What is Docker?

Since its introduction, Docker has dramatically changed the way applications are run in production and even how code is developed. Docker containers are lightweight, portable, and easy to manage. They have also changed how developers build and deploy applications and Docker solved many of the challenges with full virtual machines and CI/CD deployments, performance, along with compatibility between different Dev environments.

Docker makes deploying app packages on a server in production environments much easier since all the application prerequisites, dependencies, and requirements are contained in the Docker container image platform. Automation scripts can easily handle the creation, configuration, and updating of containers. 

Note that Docker container images are still built on top of a Linux distro like Alpine Linux or some other lightweight design with the ability to run the app image. Other popular Docker solutions allow running common database applications, Java, Python, and other apps.

The Docker Container Ecosystem

Docker extends beyond just creating containers. It encompasses an entire ecosystem, including the Docker daemon, Docker Hub registry, Docker Engine, and Docker Images, which collectively simplify the process of building, shipping, and running applications.

Using a prebuilt Docker image, developers and DevOps engineers can easily spin up popular application in development and production.

LXC vs Docker: Comparing the key differences

When comparing LXC and Docker, it’s essential to understand their fundamental differences. LXC is often seen as a more “pure” form of containerization, offering system containers that closely mimic virtual machines. Docker, on the other hand, focuses on application containers designed to run specific applications.

Take note of the following table comparing the two, and then we will compare a few characteristics:

AspectLXC (Linux Containers)Docker
Primary FocusSystem containers that mimic virtual machinesApplication containers for deploying and running apps
Container TypeMore akin to traditional VMs, offering OS-level virtualizationFocuses on application-level virtualization
Kernel SharingShares the host’s kernel, but can run different Linux distributionsShares the host’s kernel, typically the same distribution
Resource OverheadLower than VMs, slightly higher than DockerLower than both VMs and LXC
SecurityRelies on Linux kernel security, less isolation than DockerStronger isolation, less dependent on host kernel
EcosystemPrimarily the container runtime environmentExtensive ecosystem including Docker Hub, Docker Engine
PortabilityGood, but less than Docker due to OS-level virtualizationExcellent, due to app-level virtualization
Use CasesSuitable for running multiple services in one containerIdeal for microservices, CI/CD pipelines, rapid deployment
Community and SupportStrong community, less corporate backing than DockerVery large community, strong corporate support
ConfigurationMore complex, closer to traditional VM configurationSimpler, more straightforward configuration
StorageUses filesystems attached to the host systemUtilizes Docker images for storage and versioning
NetworkingSimilar to VMs, more complex setupSimplified networking, easier port mapping
ScalabilityGood for scaling verticallyBetter suited for horizontal scaling
FlexibilityMore flexible in terms of OS environmentMore focused on app environment, less OS flexibility
DeploymentSlower deployment compared to DockerRapid deployment capabilities
OrchestrationLimited native support, relies on external toolsIntegrated with Docker Swarm, compatible with Kubernetes
PerformanceGenerally good, but depends on the workloadOptimized for high performance, especially for stateless apps
IsolationOS-level isolationProcess-level isolation, stronger app separation
LXC vs Docker comparison

1. Use Cases

Note the following comparison of system containers vs application containers.

System Containers vs Application Containers

System containers provided by LXC are suitable for running a full-fledged operating system, offering an experience similar to virtual machines. Docker containers, however, are tailored for running specific applications, ensuring that each application runs in a completely isolated environment.

Understanding where LXC and Docker are the best fit is important to choose the right tool for the right job.

Choosing the right tool for the right job
Choosing the right tool for the right job

When to Choose LXC

LXC is ideal for scenarios where you need lightweight virtualization close to a full OS experience. It’s perfect for running multiple applications on the same Linux system or for situations where you need the flexibility of a virtual machine without the associated overhead.

Docker’s Ideal Scenarios

Docker shines in application deployment and scaling. It’s the go-to choice for microservices architecture, CI/CD pipelines, and rapid application development and deployment. Docker’s portability makes it a favorite for cloud-based applications.

2. Security Considerations of LXC vs Docker

No discussion about container technologies is complete without addressing security. Both LXC and Docker offer robust security features, but their approaches differ.

Lxc vs docker security considerations
Lxc vs docker security considerations

Security in LXC Containers

LXC’s approach to security revolves around Linux kernel features. It leverages namespaces and cgroups to create isolated environments. However, since LXC containers share the same kernel as the host, any vulnerabilities in the kernel can potentially affect all containers.

Docker’s Security Model

Docker’s security model is more granular when copared to LXC, offering additional layers of isolation and less dependency on the host system’s kernel. Docker containers are less likely to affect each other or the host system, making them a safer choice in multi-tenant environments.

3. Orchestration

What about container orchestration with LXC vs Docker for management and scalability? Docker has a native orchestration tool called Docker Swarm. When you have multiple Docker container hosts, you can enable Swarm mode for your container hosts and Docker Swarm will schedule containers and provide high availability and orchestration for your containers.

Orchestration lxc vs docker
Orchestration lxc vs docker

LXC doesn’t have a native orchestration tool in Linux to schedule LXCs comparable to running Docker containers in Swarm. However, there are a few community projects that ones have worked on to do some LXC scheduling. Also, Hashicorp Nomad has an LXC driver for scheduling tasks using LXC: Drivers: LXC | Nomad | HashiCorp Developer.

As a note, why didn’t we mention Kubernetes? Recently, Kubernetes has made the shift from Docker containers as the container runtime to containerd for container services. Interestingly, you can also run Kubernetes in Docker using a tool called K3D.

4. Backups

If you are like me, one of the areas of a technology that you automatically consider is how do you protect that specific technology. How do you backup your containers? LXC containers have a very easy way to be backed up, especially if you are running Proxmox. Proxmox Backup Server natively backs up your LXC containers.

Lxc vs docker backups
Lxc vs docker backups

Backing up Docker containers can be a mixed bag of tools. Typically, most when running Docker containers run persistent volumes that allow mounting local storage from the Docker host to pass into the Docker container state. Backing up Docker usually involves backing up this persistent data and then simply repulling the container image and mounting the data.

There are a few solutions out there like the Duplicati solution that I have written about before: 

Backup Docker Volumes with Duplicati and Docker Compose

5. Networking

Networking is an important component of running containers. LXC containers take advantage of the native Linux networking constructs like Linux bridge devices or Linux VLANs. 

Docker on the other hand has its own networking constructs:

  • Bridge: This is the standard network driver used by default.
  • Host: This driver removes network isolation, allowing the container to directly interact with the Docker host.
  • None: This option ensures total isolation of a container from the host and other containers.
  • Overlay: Used for connecting multiple Docker daemons, creating a network overlay.
  • IPvlan: Allows detailed control over both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses within networks.
  • Macvlan: Enables the assignment of a unique MAC address to a container.

6. Platform compatibility

One of the important things to consider with LXC vs Docker containers is platform compatibility. With LXC containers, they by nature only compatible with Linux operating systems. However, Docker can run on Linux, Windows, and macOS, making it much more platform independent.

However, there are some restrictions here as well as you must make sure the Docker image is a Windows Docker image or a Linux Docker image as the kernel requirements must match or you will run into issues running Docker on your servers. Many work around this by running a Linux VM on top of Windows, or vice versa. Of course, you can also run LXC containers on a Windows platform if you run them in a Linux VM.

6. Future of LXC vs Docker

As container technologies evolve, both LXC and Docker continue to play significant roles in shaping the future of software development and deployment.

Lxc vs docker the future
Lxc vs docker the future

Innovations in LXC

LXC is continuously improving, focusing on enhancing its system container capabilities, security features, and integration with existing Linux systems.

Docker’s Ongoing Evolution

Docker, always at the forefront of containerization technology, is constantly evolving. Its focus remains on simplifying application containerization, improving security, and enhancing portability across different environments.

Frequently Asked Questions About LXC and Docker

How do LXC and Docker utilize the Linux kernel for containerization?

LXC leverages Linux kernel features such as cgroups and namespaces to provide an environment close to traditional virtual machines but with lower overhead. Docker also uses these features, but focuses more on isolated processes for each application, ensuring that each Docker container is lightweight and portable.

What are the security implications of using LXC and Docker?

Security in LXC is dependent on the Linux kernel’s built-in features. Since LXC containers share the kernel with the host, vulnerabilities in the kernel can affect them. Docker, however, adds more isolation layers, reducing the dependency on the host’s kernel and offering a more secure environment for running containers.

Can Docker and LXC be used together for containerization?

Yes, Docker and LXC can be used in tandem. For instance, Docker can be used for its efficient application containerization and rapid deployment capabilities, while LXC can be utilized for situations that require a full operating system environment within a container.

What are the main differences in resource usage between Docker and LXC?

Docker containers are generally more resource-efficient compared to LXC, especially when running multiple isolated processes for different applications. LXC, while efficient compared to virtual machines, may consume more resources when used for full-fledged operating system environments.

How do Docker Swarm and LXC compare in terms of container orchestration?

Docker Swarm is a native clustering and orchestration tool for Docker containers, enabling users to manage multiple Docker containers as a single system. LXC doesn’t have a native orchestration tool like Docker Swarm, but it can be integrated with external tools for managing multiple LXC containers.

What is the role of Docker Hub in the Docker ecosystem?

Docker Hub acts as a public repository for Docker images, allowing users to share and access container images. It’s an important part of the Docker ecosystem, making the distribution and version control of Docker images easier and more convenient.

In what scenarios would LXC be preferred over Docker?

LXC would be preferred in scenarios requiring a lightweight alternative to full virtual machines, such as running multiple applications on a single Linux system or when the overhead of a complete virtual machine is unnecessary. LXC is also useful for users who need a more traditional Linux environment within their containers.

What are the advantages of Docker’s application containers in development environments?

Docker’s application containers offer advantages like portability, quick startup times, and consistent environments across different stages of development. This makes Docker ideal for continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines and microservice architecture.

Does using LXC require prior Linux knowledge?

Having an understanding of the Linux operating system and Linux kernel features can be helpful when working with LXC, as it makes use of Linux constructs. However, basic container operations with LXC can be performed without in-depth Linux knowledge.

Wrapping up LXC vs Docker containers

Both LXC containers and Docker containers provide many benefits and capabilities when compared to running full virtual machines. For this reason, containers have become the de facto standard for running modern cloud workloads across the Internet. Most apps in the cloud support containerized deployments and migration. 

Containers are not a drop-in replacement for virtual machines, but they do work hand-in-hand with VMs to provide a scalable, resilient, and microservices architecture. This comparison of LXC vs Docker helps to differentiate between the two types of containers and their use cases. Let me know in the comments what types of containers you are using and what use cases.

Subscribe to VirtualizationHowto via Email 🔔

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Brandon Lee

Brandon Lee is the Senior Writer, Engineer and owner at and has over two decades of experience in Information Technology. Having worked for numerous Fortune 500 companies as well as in various industries, He has extensive experience in various IT segments and is a strong advocate for open source technologies. Brandon holds many industry certifications, loves the outdoors and spending time with family. Also, he goes through the effort of testing and troubleshooting issues, so you don't have to.

Related Articles

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.